Both methods create a double-eyelid crease, but they reach it in very different ways: one through a full incision, one through buried sutures with no incision. The better choice is not the more popular one — it depends on the thickness of your lid, how much skin and fat you carry, and what you want the result to do over time.
Garnet is well known for neck-wrinkle and lifting surgery. The facility is excellent and I’m thoroughly satisfied with the friendly consultation and the surgeon’s skill.
Director Baek In-soo, thank you so much. Thanks to you I keep getting told I look younger — it feels like I’ve gone back to my younger days.
I had upper and lower eyelid surgery and I’m really satisfied. The director and the manager were both so kind and clear.
I started with under-eye fat repositioning — the director and the manager are genuinely kind and good at what they do. I’ll be back.
I came on a referral and was very satisfied thanks to the doctor’s kind consultation and clear explanations. The nurses were friendly too.
I kept reading the reviews and came trusting the many mentions of skill and kindness. The clinic was busy with patients and spotless.
The two operations share a goal — a defined upper-eyelid crease — but the route is different. The non-incision double eyelid uses buried sutures: fine stitches are passed inside the lid to fix an adhesion between the skin and the muscle that lifts the lid, forming the crease line without an external incision. Because nothing is opened, there is no skin scar, and the surgeon does not remove skin or fat.
The incision double eyelid takes a fuller approach. The surgeon makes a full incision along the planned crease line, which allows excess skin to be trimmed and bulky fat or muscle to be reduced before the crease is built and the incision closed. That opening is what gives the incision method its ability to reshape a heavy lid — and it is also why recovery is a little longer.
A useful way to picture it: the non-incision method ties the crease into place, while the incision method rebuilds the lid and sets the crease in tissue that has been thinned and tidied. Neither is automatically superior; they solve different starting points. The honest question is not which is newer or more popular, but which one matches the lid you actually have.
Recovery is the most visible difference between the two. With the non-incision method there is no incision to heal, swelling is generally milder, and at Garnet the buried sutures are typically reviewed and the small fixation points settle around five days. Most people find the early recovery quicker and the eyes look presentable sooner, although bruising still varies from person to person.
The incision method asks for more patience. Because the lid is opened, trimmed and closed, there is more initial swelling and bruising, and the external sutures are usually removed around seven days. The crease can look firm and a touch high in the first weeks while swelling resolves, and the final, settled look takes longer to emerge than with buried sutures.
For a day-by-day picture of the incision route, our incision double eyelid recovery timeline walks through what is normal at each stage. If you are weighing a short trip to Korea, the difference of a couple of recovery days can matter — but it should never be the only reason to choose a method that does not suit your lid.
Durability is where the trade-off becomes clearest. Because the incision method removes excess skin and fat and sets the crease in reshaped tissue, the result tends to be more stable and well-defined over the long term, which is one reason it is preferred for lids that are heavy or have a lot of skin. The crease it builds is designed to be lasting.
The non-incision crease is held by buried sutures rather than by reshaped tissue. For thin, suitable lids it can hold very well, but on heavier lids the fixation can loosen or the crease can fade or become shallow over time, because the underlying weight was never reduced. This is not a flaw in the technique — it is simply the limit of a method that does not remove tissue.
If a stable, defined crease that keeps its shape is your priority, and especially if your lid is on the thicker side, the incision method usually serves that goal better. If you value a quicker, less invasive procedure and your lid is thin, the non-incision method may give you a result that lasts well for your particular anatomy. The realistic durability for your eyes specifically is something a surgeon can only judge after examining them.
As a general guide, thin eyelids with little excess skin or fat often do beautifully with the non-incision method: there is little to remove, so buried sutures alone can form and hold a clean crease. Younger patients with springy skin and no hooding are common good candidates for the suture approach.
Thicker, fattier lids, lids with redundant or hooding skin, and noticeably asymmetric eyes usually call for an incision. The incision method lets the surgeon reduce bulk, remove hanging skin and balance the two sides — work that buried sutures cannot do. Patients who have had a non-incision procedure that faded, or who want a more clearly defined crease, also tend to fall on the incision side.
There is also overlap, and that grey zone is exactly where an in-person assessment earns its keep. Two people who both want a 'natural double eyelid' can need opposite methods because their lids are built differently. To go deeper on candidacy for the incision route specifically, see who incision double eyelid is for.
Start from your lid, not from the method's reputation. The order of questions that actually helps is: how thick is the lid, how much skin and fat is present, is there hooding or asymmetry, and how lasting and defined do you want the crease to be? Those answers point to a method far more reliably than browsing before-and-after photos of other people's eyes.
Be wary of a clinic that recommends the same method to everyone, or that pushes the quicker option purely because your trip is short. A trustworthy assessment will sometimes tell you the method you hoped for is not the right one — and will explain why in terms of your specific anatomy. Cost differs between the two as well; our guide on incision double eyelid cost in Korea covers what drives the price of the incision route.
You do not have to decide before you travel. You can send clear photos of your eyes for an honest pre-assessment in an online consultation from abroad, hear which method genuinely fits and why, and confirm the plan in person before anything is booked.
Garnet is a single-surgeon clinic in Apgujeong, Seoul. Dr. In-Soo Baek is a board-certified plastic surgeon (Korean medical licence no. 77407) and the only operating doctor — he examines your lids, advises whether the incision or non-incision method genuinely suits them, performs the operation himself and reviews you through recovery. There is no separate consultant promising one method and a different doctor performing another.
Because the same surgeon who assesses you also operates, the recommendation is grounded in the eyes in front of him rather than a default protocol, and the clinic caps the day at a small number of cases so each one has unhurried time. Follow-up is structured at 1, 3 and 6 months, so a non-incision crease that needs review or an incision crease settling over weeks is seen by the surgeon who built it.
If you would like a clear, no-pressure read on which method fits your eyes, you can start with an online assessment and send photos before planning a trip. Garnet is registered with Korea's foreign-patient programme and coordinates consultation, scheduling and after-care for international visitors.
Send photos and your question before you travel. An English-speaking coordinator reviews every enquiry and replies with honest guidance on whether surgery is appropriate, the likely plan and timing.
Prefer to chat now? Reach the coordinator directly: