A non-incision double eyelid is made by tying buried sutures that hold a crease without an open cut, which is exactly why it is gentle to recover from and also why it can loosen. Revision here is its own decision: sometimes a single knot has released and the fold has faded, sometimes the two sides never quite matched, and sometimes the honest answer is that a buried technique was always going to struggle with a particular lid. This page sets out what non-incision double eyelid revision really involves and when a re-tie is enough versus when an incisional crease is the more durable fix.
Garnet is well known for neck-wrinkle and lifting surgery. The facility is excellent and I’m thoroughly satisfied with the friendly consultation and the surgeon’s skill.
Director Baek In-soo, thank you so much. Thanks to you I keep getting told I look younger — it feels like I’ve gone back to my younger days.
I had upper and lower eyelid surgery and I’m really satisfied. The director and the manager were both so kind and clear.
I started with under-eye fat repositioning — the director and the manager are genuinely kind and good at what they do. I’ll be back.
I came on a referral and was very satisfied thanks to the doctor’s kind consultation and clear explanations. The nurses were friendly too.
I kept reading the reviews and came trusting the many mentions of skill and kindness. The clinic was busy with patients and spotless.
A non-incision double eyelid is created by passing fine sutures under the skin and tying them so the lid folds along a chosen line, with no open incision and the knots buried out of sight. That approach gives it its main advantages — a quick recovery, little visible scarring, and a fold that can be adjusted more easily than a cut crease. It also sets up the one weakness that brings people back: the crease is held by knots rather than by a healed scar, and knots can loosen.
The most common reason for revision, then, is a fold that has weakened. A crease may fade within months, drop lower than it was, become shallow so it only shows in certain light, or partly release on one side so the fold looks broken or incomplete. Because the technique depends on fixation rather than healing, a proportion of buried-suture creases soften over time — which is a known trade-off of choosing the gentler method, not necessarily a sign anything was done wrong.
Beyond loosening, people also seek revision for folds that never matched between the two eyes, a line that sits too high and looks surprised or too low and looks faint, or a crease that keeps vanishing when the eyes are tired, swollen or first open in the morning. Each of these has a different cause, and separating them matters — because a slipped knot, an over-high line and a lid that was simply too heavy for buried sutures all lead to different plans.
A fresh non-incision crease usually looks higher, deeper and more prominent than the final result, and much of what alarms people in the first weeks is simply swelling. A puffy lid pushes the fold up and can make it look staring or uneven; as the swelling falls, the crease relaxes to a lower, softer and more natural line. Judging the shape or symmetry of a buried-suture fold before that settling is finished leads people to chase a problem that time would have solved.
Early asymmetry is especially misleading here. The two lids rarely swell or settle at the same pace, so a fold that looks uneven at one or two weeks often evens out by six to eight as both sides come down. Mild redness along the suture line, small tender points where the knots sit, and a slightly tight feeling on blinking are all part of the normal early picture rather than reasons to reopen anything.
What does not reliably settle on its own is a crease that has clearly loosened, dropped or partly released once the swelling has gone, a fold that stays visibly higher or lower than the other side after the early weeks, or a line that keeps disappearing entirely. A knot that has slipped will not re-tie itself, and a fold that has genuinely failed will not deepen with more time. These are the concerns where revision is reasonably considered — and the first step is telling them apart from the normal settling above.
Buried-suture revision is a spectrum, and matching the response to the cause is the whole skill. At the lighter end, a crease that has simply loosened or faded on an otherwise thin, suitable lid can often be re-tied — fresh sutures placed and fixed to restore the fold, keeping the appeal of the non-incision approach with its quick recovery and hidden scars. If the original method was sound and only a knot slipped, a careful re-tie is frequently all that is needed.
Uneven folds are handled differently again: rather than redoing both eyes, the surgeon usually adjusts the weaker or mismatched side toward the other so the two creases match, tying a new line at the correct height rather than tightening everything. A line set too high can be lowered, and a shallow or broken fold can be re-formed — the buried approach is comparatively forgiving to adjust precisely because it does not rely on a fixed scar.
At the firmer end is switching methods. When a lid is thick, has heavy or hooding skin, carries excess fat, or when a buried crease has already loosened more than once, repeating the same non-incision tie tends to disappoint again — the sutures have more to hold than they reliably can. In that situation an incision double eyelid, which forms the crease through a healed line and can remove excess skin and fat at the same time, is usually the more durable answer. Choosing between a re-tie and a switch is exactly what a careful assessment is for.
Timing is the most important decision in this revision, and for most early concerns the honest answer is to wait. In the first weeks the crease is still sitting high on a swollen lid, the two sides are settling at different rates, and the tissue around the buried sutures is still calming down. Retying into a freshly treated, inflamed lid to fix an unevenness that would have resolved anyway makes a clean correction harder and risks trading one irregularity for another.
As a general principle, a surgeon prefers to let a buried-suture crease settle before deciding on revision, so the shape is judged on a calm lid rather than a swollen one — usually a matter of a couple of months for symmetry and final height. Judging whether a crease has truly loosened rather than merely relaxed also needs time, since a fold naturally softens and lowers as swelling goes before reaching its stable form. Rushing to re-tie a fold that is still coming down is the most common avoidable mistake.
There is one clear exception: signs that need prompt review rather than patience — a suture that is spitting or working its way to the surface, persistent redness, discharge or unusual pain, or a knot causing an obvious lump. Those are reviewed early. For the far more common problem of a crease that has quietly faded or dropped once everything has settled, there is no urgency and every reason to plan the revision calmly; the timeline for when the result settles explains what a stable fold should look like before you decide.
A careful revision begins with working out what was done before — how the original crease was tied, how high the line sits, how thick the lid is, how much skin and fat are present, and how long ago the surgery was — because that decides whether a re-tie or a switch is realistic. The surgeon examines how the fold behaves when the eyes are open, closed, tired and looking down, which reveals whether a knot has slipped or the lid was simply carrying more than buried sutures could hold.
For a straightforward re-tie, fresh sutures are placed under the skin and fixed to re-form the crease at the agreed height, the old fixation is accounted for, and the two sides are balanced against each other rather than set independently. Because there is no open cut, the recovery resembles a primary non-incision eyelid: swelling and a high-looking fold that relaxes over the following weeks, with sutures out early. The non-incision recovery timeline covers that day-by-day pattern.
When the plan is to switch to an incisional crease, the redo is more deliberate: the crease is formed through a healed line, excess skin or fat can be addressed at the same time, and the trade-off is a longer settling period and a fine scar hidden in the fold in exchange for a more durable result. Revision is more demanding than a first buried-suture crease and is best done on a settled lid by an experienced surgeon — the goal is to solve the specific problem with the smallest appropriate step, not to keep re-tying a fold that a particular lid was never going to hold.
Garnet is a single-surgeon clinic in Apgujeong, Seoul. Dr. In-Soo Baek is a board-certified plastic surgeon (Korean medical licence no. 77407) and the only operating doctor — he assesses each revision case himself, plans it himself, performs it himself and reviews every follow-up, with structured reviews at one, three and six months. For a revision, that continuity matters: the surgeon who examines your earlier crease is the one accountable for whether a re-tie or a switch is the honest call.
Revision assessment at Garnet is deliberately unhurried and honest. That includes being willing to say that an early unevenness needs time rather than another tie, that a single loosened side simply needs re-fixing, or that a thick or heavy lid was always going to need an incisional crease rather than more buried sutures. There is no consultation fee and no pressure to book, because a sound revision decision should never be rushed.
If you are considering correcting an earlier non-incision double eyelid from abroad, you can begin without travelling. Send your history and clear photos of the eyes open, closed and looking down for an honest pre-assessment, and read the guide for international patients for how stay length and remote follow-up are handled.
Send photos and your question before you travel. An English-speaking coordinator reviews every enquiry and replies with honest guidance on whether surgery is appropriate, the likely plan and timing.
Prefer to chat now? Reach the coordinator directly: