Double-eyelid surgery gives you a crease; epicanthoplasty opens the inner corner of the eye. They are frequently combined in Korea, but adding inner-corner release is a genuine decision about your eye shape and the scar it leaves — not a routine add-on. This page explains when it helps, when it doesn't, and how the two work as one operation.
Garnet is well known for neck-wrinkle and lifting surgery. The facility is excellent and I’m thoroughly satisfied with the friendly consultation and the surgeon’s skill.
Director Baek In-soo, thank you so much. Thanks to you I keep getting told I look younger — it feels like I’ve gone back to my younger days.
I had upper and lower eyelid surgery and I’m really satisfied. The director and the manager were both so kind and clear.
I started with under-eye fat repositioning — the director and the manager are genuinely kind and good at what they do. I’ll be back.
I came on a referral and was very satisfied thanks to the doctor’s kind consultation and clear explanations. The nurses were friendly too.
I kept reading the reviews and came trusting the many mentions of skill and kindness. The clinic was busy with patients and spotless.
Many people have a small fold of skin at the inner corner of the eye — the epicanthal or "Mongolian" fold — that partly covers the pink inner corner and can make the eyes look shorter or more closed-set. Epicanthoplasty releases that band so the inner corner is revealed and the eye reads slightly longer horizontally. At Garnet this is done as a two-way (medial and upper) release of the fold.
This is a different change from a crease. Double-eyelid surgery adds a fold to the upper lid, changing the eye vertically and giving it a defined line; epicanthoplasty works at the corner, changing the eye horizontally. Because the two act on different dimensions of the same eye, they influence the overall shape together — which is exactly why the decision to combine them is a design question, not a formality.
It is worth being clear that not everyone has a pronounced inner fold, and not everyone who does is bothered by it. If your inner corners are already open, releasing them further changes little and can look unnatural — so the first question is whether the fold is actually limiting your eye shape.
The honest starting point is your own anatomy. Epicanthoplasty tends to help when a prominent inner fold makes the eyes look short, when the fold interrupts the line of a new crease so the crease can't taper naturally toward the inner corner, or when you specifically want a longer, more open eye shape. If none of these describe you, adding it gives little benefit for a lasting change and a scar.
There is also a proportion question. Releasing the inner corners increases the amount of visible eye and reduces the distance between the eyes — a subtle change that suits some faces and over-opens others. A good surgeon considers how far apart your eyes already sit and how much release is appropriate, rather than opening the corners the same amount for everyone. Small differences here noticeably change the outcome.
So the decision is not "crease plus corner is better". It is: does your inner fold genuinely limit your eye shape, and are you comfortable with a small lasting scar to change it? For some patients the answer is a clear yes; for others, a crease alone — sometimes even a non-incision crease — is the right, smaller operation.
When both are indicated, doing them together is sensible for a design reason rather than a discount. The crease and the inner corner meet at the same part of the eye: where the fold tapers toward the nose depends on whether the inner corner is opened. Planning both in one operation lets the surgeon shape the crease to flow into the released corner, which is harder to reconcile if the two are done months apart.
It is also practical. The incisions for the crease and for the inner-corner release are close together and heal over a similar window, so combining them means one operation and one recovery instead of two — useful for an international patient making a single trip. But that convenience should follow the decision that you need both, not drive it.
If you only need a crease, combining adds an unnecessary lasting change. If you have a strong inner fold but a naturally good lid, some surgeons will discuss whether the corner release alone meets your goal. The point is to match the operation to your eye, and combining is the answer only when both parts genuinely improve the shape.
In a combined case the surgeon forms the double-eyelid crease and performs the inner-corner release in the same session. Because epicanthoplasty is a two-way release of the fold at the medial corner, the surgeon designs it in relation to the new crease so the two transitions look continuous — the fold tapering into the opened corner rather than stopping abruptly.
The precision is at the inner corner. How much to release, and how to lay the small incision so it settles discreetly, is a matter of fine judgement, and the natural-looking outcome depends heavily on that design. This is one reason an experienced surgeon and unhurried operating time matter for corner work specifically, and why the crease is set with the corner in mind rather than separately.
Ask who performs the corner release. It is a delicate, visible part of the eye that is not easily revised, so confirming that the same board-certified surgeon does both the crease and the epicanthoplasty — from consultation through surgery — is a reasonable thing to establish in writing before you commit.
The honest trade-off of epicanthoplasty is the scar. Releasing the inner corner leaves a small incision in a visible part of the eye. In most patients it fades and becomes inconspicuous over months, but it is in an area people notice, and how it heals varies between individuals. Sutures for the combined operation typically come out around day 7, with swelling and some redness at the corners in the first week or two that is expected, not final.
The corners settle gradually. Early on the released inner corner can look pinker or more open than it will finally read, and the scar is at its most noticeable in the first weeks before it matures. Judging the result before a few months have passed is misleading — corner healing is one of the clearer arguments for structured follow-up rather than a single early check.
Reversibility is the key caution. Once the inner-corner fold is released, restoring it is difficult, so this is not a change to make on impulse or because it was offered alongside the crease. That is precisely why the decision should rest on whether your inner fold genuinely limits your eye shape — a change you are choosing deliberately, not a routine addition.
Garnet is a single-surgeon clinic in Apgujeong, Seoul. Dr. In-Soo Baek is a board-certified plastic surgeon (Korean medical licence no. 77407) and the only operating doctor — he consults, performs both the crease and the inner-corner release himself, and reviews every follow-up, with the day capped at two surgeries so delicate corner work is not rushed. Garnet is registered with Korea's foreign-patient programme.
The clinic's stated approach is to address only what you came for and not to over-recommend, so epicanthoplasty is proposed on the basis of your inner-corner anatomy rather than as a default add-on to a crease. Follow-up is structured at 1, 3 and 6 months, which suits corner healing that matures over time. You can start with a no-obligation online assessment and send close photos of your inner corners for an honest opinion on whether a crease alone, or a crease with epicanthoplasty, suits your eyes.
Send photos and your question before you travel. An English-speaking coordinator reviews every enquiry and replies with honest guidance on whether surgery is appropriate, the likely plan and timing.
Prefer to chat now? Reach the coordinator directly: